21 Risks in not adopting Enterprise 2.0

Dion Hinchcliffe identified some reasons why Enterprise 2.0 projects can fail.  As with any IT project, failure is statistically an option even without bringing Web 2.0 into the equation.  The second common cause of failure was the bottom up failure of adoption .  I think a bigger risk is that companies fail to understand changes that are happening in the work place and society, and don’t react in a proactive way.   There is significant risk in failing to acknowledge Web 2.0 as a major tool in business administration.  Hopefully I will find some companies who have failed to identify this risk and can add their details at a later date

  • Graduates and young employees perceive the company as old fashioned and competitors attract talented, younger staff
  • Costs increase as a company is restrictively aligned with Microsoft or Apple products
  • Inefficient practices of emailing pdf or word documents continues
  • Time in checking emails results in reduced productivity
  • Reduced moral due to old work practices and the company not keeping up the pace of change
  • The water cooler news is not transformed to an online experience
  • Restrictions in communication and collaboration due to a global workforce and community, and inefficient practices
  • Inability to find relevant company information due to old file systems
  • Reputation amongst customers and suppliers
  • Inability to engage in two way dialogue with customers, and possibly build goodwill
  • Restricted ability to communicate and market to customers
  • Inability to conduct relevant competitor analysis
  • Inability to rapidly respond to aggrieved customers
  • Restricted ability to operate remotely or in a mobile environment
  • Unexpected outcomes associated with adopting new technology may not occur
  • Potential customers may not be aware of the company – Customers may develop a positive attitude without actually purchasing products, or interacting with staff
  • The static web site does not adequately portray the company, staff and its vision
  • The company may be getting an ineffective return on marketing dollars spent in print or other media
  • Delayed communication to customers due to old practices
  • Many customers will form an online opinion, whether you are there or not – it is better to positively guide this experience
  • Many Web 2.0 tools are open source, and cheaper to maintain and initiate

Hinchcliffe summed up the challenges in implementing Enterprise 2.0 with “Creating and nurturing a community and keeping it thriving is not something that a project plan alone can achieve or that the traditional stakeholders in software projects are often skilled at. It takes diligence, patience, engagement, emotional intelligence, and understanding of the needs and motivations of participants to be successful for the long term.”  I think there are greater risks with no adoption.

5 Comments

  1. Posted August 24, 2009 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Interesting post!
    Good to have a clear list of risks written down.
    Makes it easy to apply to the “real world”, in order to sell web 2.0 services to a client.
    Thanks for sharing!

  2. Posted August 26, 2009 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Hinchcliffe is a great E2.0 advocate, I think he wrote that article just to show mistakes of some E2.0 start-ups, so that others would never repeat them. I like your list, but some of the reasons you mentioned may sound not very important to a big corporation CEO who knows very little about the whole E2.0 movement. I guess, there are still millions of people who think that there’s nothing wrong with Iemailing pdf or word documents. In fact most of them will probably even find it very convenient. You need to dig deeper and show why these practices are not the best.

  3. pete
    Posted August 28, 2009 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    thank-you for your positive feedback
    My article was not directly aimed at CEO’s but generally they are the ones that influence implementation and culture
    I will expand on my list, and add some further explanations in the future
    regards Peter

  4. Posted October 20, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    A lot of these points hit the nail on the head, and it’s a great collection to identify the rationale behind why you’re implementing a particular social network. We don’t want to inundate the company with Web 2.0 tools sheerly for the sake of portraying a tech-savvy company who’s ‘down with’ popular trends; there are huge disadvantages to not paying attention. Missing out on exposure, participatory marketing, peer-to-peer connections beyond the usual consortia or annual staff conferences. Together, these tools can utterly reshape a company.

  5. pete
    Posted October 20, 2009 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    Catherine
    thanks for your comments – paying attention to your customers – great piece of key information
    Can reshape a company, or see it drift into oblivion
    cheers Pete

4 Trackbacks

  1. By Checkpoint- Web 2.0 is like Cooking on August 25, 2009 at 8:30 pm

    [...] and then identified Risks to Business in not adopting Enterprise 2.0 [...]

  2. [...] 21 Risks in not adopting Enterprise 2.0 21 risks in not adopting Enterprise 2.0: http://bit.ly/3HgSbp [fixed link] [from http://twitter.com/dhinchcliffe/statuses/3514450846 [...]

  3. By 21 Web 2.0 predictions for 2010 on January 15, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    [...] a place where interesting, relevant articles are posted relating to “Web 2.0“, “Enterprise 2.0” and any other discoveries in the online blogossphere where I feel there is a lack of quality [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>